Which term describes a legal wrong that can result in injury due to omissions or acts intended to cause harm?

Which term describes a legal wrong that can result in injury due to omissions or acts intended to cause harm?

• A. Tort
• B. Negligence
• C. Criminal offense
• D. Breach of contract

Answer: (A)

A tort is a civil wrong that results in injury or harm, for which the injured party can seek damages in civil court. It covers harm caused by both intentional acts and omissions (failures to act) when there is a duty to act or to prevent harm. That makes it the best fit for the description, because it specifically encompasses harms caused by either deliberate actions or failures to act, and it focuses on remedies sought by individuals. Negligence is a particular type of tort that involves failing to exercise reasonable care, leading to injury. It can involve an omission, but its defining feature is the lack of reasonable care, not necessarily an intent to harm. Criminal offenses are violations of criminal law and involve punishment by the state, not civil compensation for the harmed party. Breach of contract is about failing to fulfill contractual duties and typically involves remedies within contract law, not a general civil wrong that results in injury to a person outside of a contractual context.

A tort is a civil wrong that results in injury or harm, for which the injured party can seek damages in civil court. It covers harm caused by both intentional acts and omissions (failures to act) when there is a duty to act or to prevent harm. That makes it the best fit for the description, because it specifically encompasses harms caused by either deliberate actions or failures to act, and it focuses on remedies sought by individuals.

Negligence is a particular type of tort that involves failing to exercise reasonable care, leading to injury. It can involve an omission, but its defining feature is the lack of reasonable care, not necessarily an intent to harm. Criminal offenses are violations of criminal law and involve punishment by the state, not civil compensation for the harmed party. Breach of contract is about failing to fulfill contractual duties and typically involves remedies within contract law, not a general civil wrong that results in injury to a person outside of a contractual context.